The objection is unfortunate
because it is so misguided. But how can
I argue? I cannot claim to know another
parent’s child as well as he, and I certainly cannot attack his parenting
skills on this basis. Furthermore, even among the homeschooling community more agree with his objection than disagree. And yet, I know that despite the
many times I’ve heard homeschooling “experts” and supporters admit that
homeschooling isn’t for every child, – every single child can learn well at
home. How can I make this outlandish
claim? Because every child does.
Before any child enters
school he learns an entire language.
Before age five most children learn social, physical and intellectual
skills. They learn manners, their ABCs,
simple songs, how to walk, run, how to tie their shoes. They learn their colors, shapes, numbers and
nursery rhymes. At least, the children
in good homes do. “But”, one might ask,
“What about those less fortunate?” Well,
they learn, too.
Every child learns at home,
although what they learn varies.
Children in less stable or dysfunctional homes may learn survival or
coping skills. They may learn when it is
best to withdraw, act out or manipulate a situation. They may learn how to meet their own basic
personal needs and the needs of other siblings like acquiring food or seeking
shelter. They learn how to protect their
families from discovery from outsiders who may threaten what little cohesion
the family does have. I know of one severely
neglected child who learned to diaper herself at two years old.
That is not to say that all
children should be homeschooled. The simple point is, learning happens. This is the mantra of the unschooling
movement, and while I personally do not follow their formal method of education
(or lack thereof), I can’t disagree with their premise. Children learn. At home and at school, in all environments
and through multitudinous ways, children learn.
Through the influence and efforts of parents, teachers and mentors and
despite parents, teachers and mentors.
This is not to say that parents, teachers and mentors are
irrelevant. They may not determine
whether a child learns, but they undoubtedly affect what a child learns.
I will assume that, if you are reading this blog, your
children identify with the fortunate group who enjoy a healthy home
environment. You may have taught (or
will teach) your child to speak, walk, ride a tricycle, dress himself, and sing
a major C scale forward and backward: “Do-Re-Me-Fa
-So-La-Ti-Do-Do-Ti-La-So-Fa-Me-Re-Do”.
You may have already taught her the sounds of most farm animals, that
frogs lay eggs that hatch into tadpoles, and that the moon is in constant
motion. Congratulations, you qualify as
a home educator! It is not too far a
leap from teaching these simple concepts to teaching formal curricula. You are
a much more capable teacher than you may think you are!
A reasonable rebuttal would be that these are examples of
information common to adults, every day experiences, skills and observations;
teaching algebra, or biology or English grammar is another matter. What this rebuttal misses is that parents
have a unique advantage over classroom teachers. We have the advantage of receiving our
teacher’s “certification” over a much larger time frame than the professional
teacher. We tackle what we know first,
and grow with our children to handle the tougher subjects when the time comes. The parent of a preschooler has eight years
to get algebra under her belt! So, we
start with number concepts and counting, and progress to operations, place
value, fact families, multiplication tables, fractions, negative numbers and by
the time the kids reach the middle grades we are ready with at the most a
little prep to move on to algebra.
Of course, fear drives the
hesitation parents feel about taking on the awesome responsibility of formally
educating one’s own child, especially those children who aim for a college
degree. Take courage. The most brilliant minds of history were not
the products of a professional education industry but initially taught by their
own parents or tutors in the home. The
task is not as impossible as it seems.
Public education is a recent phenomenon in human history.
I do grant that today the
sheer volume of information that children must learn by the time they graduate
high school exceeds that required of children just decades ago. But the homeschooling parent does not teach
in a vacuum, nor does he rely exclusively on his own knowledge and talents.
There is a lot of help “out there” for homeschooling parents, just as there is
for teachers.
You are a much more capable teacher than you may think you
are, and you do not have to be an “expert” educator. We parents often presume that today’s
teachers are wellsprings of knowledge.
But certified teachers are actually practitioners of methodology, more
sociologists than instructors. In order
to manage classrooms of many children with various personalities, diverse
cultures and a range of skill levels, teachers may be appropriately expert in
child development, conflict resolution, standards and benchmarks or learning
styles but less so in actual subject matter.
Today’s teachers need not be grammarians, historians or
philosophers. Some may be, but many are
not. After all, material resources
provide subject matter. Generally, today’s
teacher’s facilitate learning, but they do not teach in the classic sense of
the word.
Home is the most natural place for all children to
learn. It is the first classroom for
most American children. Why should that
change just because the child has reached the age of six? Your children can learn at home. They already have.
Image: photostock / FreeDigitalPhotos.net
I loved this post. Although we plan on sending our kids to public school I have been toying with the idea of sructured home "preschooling". We have one son with a late July birthday who will be turning 5 this year. You've encouraged me to dig right in!
ReplyDelete